I am no Hillary Clinton fan, but there's no way a right-thinking person can deny the fact she is being treated unfairly. What exactly is it with the prevailing media? You have to ask what the agenda is.
Her comment on RFK's assassination was maybe a little clumsy, and maybe a little too raw for someone seeking to be president, but it certainly isn't bizarre. It was an historical reference that I understood upon hearing it for what it was. Now Barama's camp is suggesting part of her campaign strategy is to wait for Barama to get assassinated. Are you kidding me? Where the hell do we live, Ukraine? The preceding question was a presidential poisoning reference for those of you who don't pay attention.
So is it that we can't use the word "assassination" now? Seriously, I'd like someone to step forward and tell me exactly what was wrong with the reference she used. Not supposition, but fact based on her words and usage.
People, you need to start wondering about the information you get and how accurate it is, and you need to seriously start examining the presumed Democrat nominee for president. It seems he is as naive, ill-informed and petulant as your average suburban soccer mom and dad or twenty-five year-old know-it-all, and that scares the hell out of me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment